ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGER IN END-TO-END COMMERCIALIZATION, FROM A CASE OF TELE-ECG SYSTEM

Authors

  • Chanakya Hingu Smt. Indira Gandhi College of Engineering
  • Tushar Kedare Smt. Indira Gandhi College of Engineering
  • Mayur Tidke Smt. Indira Gandhi College of Engineering
  • Mansi Vala Smt. Indira Gandhi College of Engineering
  • Vineet Sinha Smt. Indira Gandhi College of Engineering
  • P. H Thyagaraju Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GZQB3

Keywords:

Technology Manager, Commercialization, End-to-End Technology Transfer

Abstract

An R&D organization that develops a commercially usable product can draw its benefit by either manufacturing &selling the new product directly to customers, or by licensing out the technology to a firm that manufactures& sells. Many a time the research organization is not mandated to manufacture & sell directly to end-users. Then licensing would be the best path available for commercialization of developed product. The main actors in this process (also called technology value chain) are developer, technology-transfer office,transferee-firm, suppliers of components / accessories, and market-researchers.It is desirable to have a central actor to coordinate all the activities to ensure the effectiveness of end-to-end technology value chain. Such a central actor may be called technology manager.A case of Tele-ECG system developed by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) of India is taken as an example. The objective of the paper is to elucidate the role of a perceived ‘technology manager’ in the process of commercialization.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individual actors such as developer, technology-transfer expert, a few technology-transferees and a few end-users. Perceptive analysis was carried out to figure out the importance of a central functionary called technology-manager.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anna Aginskaja, Maksim Belitski, RadzivonMarozau–2019 "Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding"

Changli Li, Tony Lan, Shang-Jyh Liu (2015), “Patent attorney as technology intermediary: A patent attorney facilitated model of technology transfer in developing countries”, World Patent Information, Volume 43, page 62-73.

Conor O’Kane, Vincent Mangematin, Will Geoghegan, Ciara Fitzgerald, (2015), University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy, Research Policy, Volume 44, Pages 421–437.

Conor O’Kane, (2018), Technology transfer executives' backwards integration: An examination of interactions between university technology transfer executives and principal investigators, Technovation, Volume 76-77, Pages 64–77

ErkkoAutio, Johan Bruneel, Noni Symeonidou – 2017 Commercialization strategy and internationalization outcomes in technology-based new ventures

Ferré, Frederick. (1988). Philosophy of technology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,

Grover R.B., (2001), “Technology Management by the Department of Atomic Energy”, Proceedings of National Seminar on Technology Management, Conducted by Indian Academy of Engineering at National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, during October 12th -13th, 2001.

Hua S. Gans, Scott Stern, (2003)The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs

Khalil Tarekh and R Shankar, (2000), Management of Technology: The key to competitiveness and wealth creation, Tata McGraw Hill

Grover R.B. (2019), “Integrating the function of a university to a work place to promote postacademic research”, Current Science, Vol. 117, No. 7, 10 October 2019

Heslop Louise A., Eileen McGregor, and May Griffith,(2001), Development of a Technology Readiness Assessment Measure: The Cloverleaf Model of Technology Transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, Volume 26, pages 369–384.

Jain Karuna and Rajiv S. Narvekar2003 – “Metrics for Measuring Industrial R&D Effectiveness in India”, Proceedings of International Conference on Management of R&D conducted by Dept. of Management Studies, IIT Delhi, Pages 447-452]

Maria Magdalena Jime´nez-Barrionuevo, Vıctor J. Garcı´a-Morales, Luis Miguel Molina (2011), “Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity”, Technovation, Volume 31, pages 190– 202.

Mortara et al., 2008 – Technology Intelligence practice in UK technology – based companies

Prasad (2016), “Diversification of the Indian space programme in the past decade: Perspectives on implications and challenges”, Space Policy, 36, pages 38-45

Siegel Donald S., David A. Waldman, Leanne E. Atwater, Albert N. Link, (2004) “Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies”, Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, Volume 21, pages 115-142.

Michael Nevens T.,Gregory L. Summe andBroUttal – June 1990Commercializing the technology: What the companies best can do?

Downloads

Published

2020-12-11

How to Cite

[1]
ChanakyaHingu, TusharKedare, MayurTidke, Mansi Vala, Vineet Sinha, and P. H Thyagaraju, “ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGER IN END-TO-END COMMERCIALIZATION, FROM A CASE OF TELE-ECG SYSTEM ”, IEJRD - International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 5, no. 9, p. 7, Dec. 2020.

Most read articles by the same author(s)